Florida's Vanishing Wetlands
and the Failure of No Net Loss

Gulf County case shows importance of putting wetland protection rules in writing

Posted on Jan. 15, 2010 10:09 a.m.
By Craig Pittman

A case out of the Florida Panhandle involving wetlands destruction shows how important it is to put in writing how swamps and marshes are going to be protected.

A developer named Jay Rish bought land in Gulf County in 2005 and applied for dredge and fill permits from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers -- but neither claimed jurisdiction over wetlands near St. Joseph Bay.

So even though he had yet to get a county permit to proceed with his development plans, "in August 2006 Rish began to clear and fill the property, despite objections from Hibiscus Drive residents," the Port St. Joe paper, The Star, notes.

But county officials said their hands were tied. If the state and federal government didn't want to protect those wetlands, they said, then the local government had no authority over it either.

One of the neighbors, Fred Johnson, sued to stop the work. He lost at the trial court level, but last month a three-judge panel of the First District Court of Appeal in Tallahassee said he was right.

Turns out the county did have the power to stop wetlands destruction -- and it was in writing, for all to see. In 1992, Gulf County signed an agreement with the Florida Department of Community Affairs that said “development within 50 feet of coastal waters and wetlands (including salt marsh areas) will be prohibited.” That provision aimed to promote the “protection of wetlands and other surface water resources, specifically the St. Joseph Bay Aquatic Preserve…”

County officials may not be the only ones who dropped the ball. The Star pointed out that during the original trial, "a retired FDEP employee testified that the wetlands at issue were connected to St. Joseph Bay and the FDEP and Corps were mistaken in not taking jurisdiction. An environmental consultant testifying for Rish acknowledged on cross examination that the Corps would appear to have jurisdiction of the wetlands on Rish’s property."

After the ruling came out, the neighbor who challenged the development released this statement: “In this case, Gulf County allowed Mr. Rish to dump over 150 truck loads of fill dirt into wetlands that are adjacent to St. Joe Bay. With this opinion to guide it, I hope Gulf County will order Mr. Rish to restore the wetlands that were illegally filled so that they can again provide a natural buffer that will help maintain the pristine quality of the Bay."

In "Paving Paradise", we tell several stories about neighbors like Johnson who are willing to spend their own time and money trying to protect wetlands. If the people who live near them can see the value of maintaining these swamps and marshes, it makes you wonder why the agencies that are supposed to protect them find it all too easy to allow them to be wiped out.

Supreme Court gets a chance to botch another wetlands case

Posted on Jan. 8, 2012 9 p.m.
By Craig Pittman

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court will take up the somewhat tangled case of Mike and Chantell Sackett , whose ...

Read more

U.S. wetlands are "at a tipping point" -- and worse off than report says

Posted on Oct. 13, 2011 10:05 p.m.
By Craig Pittman

The U.S. Interior Department issued its latest report on the status and trends of the nation's wetlands last week, and ...

Read more

New study shows Supreme Court decision left wetlands vulnerable

Posted on Sept. 13, 2011 8:07 p.m.
By Craig Pittman

Last week the Environmental Law Institute released an extensive new study on the state of the nation's wetlands in the ...

Read more

House casts historic vote to yank EPA's Clean Water Act authority

Posted on July 13, 2011 9:57 p.m.
By Craig Pittman

In a historic vote late Wednesday, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to yank the Environmental Protection Agency's authority over ...

Read more

Obama administration tries fixing Supreme Court's wetlands "bungle"

Posted on April 28, 2011 9:02 p.m.
By Craig Pittman

The Obama administration has gotten pretty serious about the Clean Water Act lately. First the EPA launches the first-ever survey ...

Read more